I know that linux masn't a good choice for oops in its early version. but with the release of 1.5.22, I talk that all of those lik bugs will be worked out.
As I stated, it works nice and have the options I just wanted. Thank you very much. Best regards, Edward Millington. BSc, Network+ Systems Administrator Cariaccess Communications Ltd. Palm Plaza Wildey St. Michael Barbados 1-246-430-7435 Fax : 1-246-431-0170 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cariaccess.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Igor Khasilev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:03 PM Subject: Re: [OOPS] Moving back > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Edward Millington wrote: > > > It is getting to that point. > > > > With the imminent problem growing slowly as or clients increase, I cannot > > afford oops to be tripping over a small load or problems w/ network > > problems, such a a lost of connection. > > > > I will always review and test both squid and oops. > > > > For right now, I have polished up my squid config and awaiting a stable > > version of squid 2.5 for me to go back. > > Of course you should use what is better for you. I know that Oops on Linux > is not good choice and I wrote about it on the oops page. > > Igor Khasilev | > PACO Links, igor at paco dot net | > > ===================================================================== > If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body. > Archive is accessible on http://lists.paco.net/oops-eng/ > > ===================================================================== If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body. Archive is accessible on http://lists.paco.net/oops-eng/
