Ok. no prob. -----Original Message----- From: Igor Khasilev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:08:18 +0200 (EET) Subject: Re: [OOPS] Another version
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Edward D. Millington wrote: > > > Hi Igor! > > > > The company which I work for have just started preceedings for a > merger. > > > > Currently, there are running a Netcache product. > > > > This means that my days for using a put together cache machine is > over > > for sometime. > > > > Can you please tell me if oops version 3 is ready for testing? > > Version 3? I'm not so fast :). Version 2 currently can successfully > serve > GET, POST, CONNECT requests, it have resolvers, log system, > persistent proxy > connections. It have no acl, no memory/disk cache. So it is unusable > in > something which can be called production environment. > > > Igor Khasilev | > PACO Links, igor at paco dot net | > > ===================================================================== > If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body. > Archive is accessible on http://lists.paco.net/oops-eng/ ===================================================================== If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body. Archive is accessible on http://lists.paco.net/oops-eng/
