On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:03 AM, David Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with the MFC syntax is that he used a character for options (the > square brackets) that were not a part of classic Rexx. With ooRexx I think > it would be confusing since square brackets are a part of the character set. > > But I am open to other ideas and alternatives. I am not much of a fan of the > railroad diagrams either. One option, that I'm just throwing out, might be to use a different font and / or bolding for the optional and the required args. I'm not sure myself about that. I'd have to see what it actually looked like. If it came out that the difference between the optional and required args was visually distinctive, then it might be a viable option. -- Mark Miesfeld ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
