Mark Miesfeld wrote: > I think it is quite possible that a lot of people / users would rather > see 4.0.0 released sooner with orxscript support turned off than wait, > what will surely be an added 3 months or so, for 4.0.0 with orxscript. > Then we could commit to getting a minor release with orxcript turned > back on as quickly as possible. Probably commit to not start any new > work and just focus on orxscript until that minor release was done. > > I anticipate that the minor release could be done about 3 months after > the major 4.0.0 release. Chances are good that we would also have a > few bug fixes in that minor release, making it a good general release. > Not just a Windows update. > > I'd like to know what people think about this. I'll float it by > RexxLA after / if there is a consensus here that it is acceptable. > > -- > Mark Miesfeld > This idea is acceptable to me. It would help the development team focus their efforts and provide the community with a working interpreter which could be exploited sooner rather than later. This is especially true for the APIs as that mechanism could generate some activity from the open source community at large.
W. David Ashley ooRexx Team ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
