Well, I sent the following to the wrong list.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Carter [mailto:gwcar...@ezlink.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:47
To: 'RexxLA Members mailing list'
Subject: RE: [RexxLA] NUMERIC digits.

I am not a heavy REXX technician but I do frequently write and debug
small REXXs on my 32-bit workstation that are destined for use there or
on my 64-bit servers.  I suspect that I am like many others in that I
expect REXX to be REXX.  If I need more NUMERIC DIGITS I will code the
statement to ask for them;  otherwise I want the scripts to perform the
same no matter where they run.  If 64-bit REXX can provide greater
capability, fine, but unless I ask for a difference I count on there
being no difference.  If this discussion is about changing the default,
then I would ask that the default not change.  That obviously must apply
to internal functions as well.   

-----Original Message-----
From: rexxla-members-boun...@mail.rexxla.org
[mailto:rexxla-members-boun...@mail.rexxla.org] On Behalf Of Rick
McGuire
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:29
To: RexxLA Members mailing list
Subject: Re: [RexxLA] NUMERIC digits.

Ahem, RTM....check the docs for LOSTDIGITS.

Rick

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:22 PM, John Bodoh <john_bo...@infrawise.com>
wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> I have also been following this thread and I don’t understand the
problem!
> I think that if a script requires more than 9 digits to work
correctly, it
> will change it with NUMERIC.  To me the only time this would ever be
an
> issue is when a script depends precisely on 9 digits.  Like David, I
can’t
> see very many scripts being affected.
>
>
>
> To me the bigger problem (because it affects me) is the fact that the
> interpreter seems to truncate numbers to 9 digits without telling
anyone.  I
> a number of may scripts, I deal with phone numbers (10 digits without
> hyphens).  When I, for example, compare one phone number to another,
they
> may compare equal because only 9 digits are being compared.  My
program did
> not work as I expected it to but it kept on truck’n with the false
equal
> comparison.  Rather than change digits, I make it a character string
> comparison like: IF “A”number1 <> “A”number2 THEN.
>
>
>
> I wish there were a SIGNAL ON TOOMANYDIDIGS instruction where I could
catch
> these errors.
>
>
>
> John.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rexxla-members mailing list -- mailto:rexxla-memb...@mail.rexxla.org
> http://rice.safedataisp.net/mailman/listinfo/rexxla-members
>
>

_______________________________________________
rexxla-members mailing list -- mailto:rexxla-memb...@mail.rexxla.org
http://rice.safedataisp.net/mailman/listinfo/rexxla-members


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to