Of course I'll change it if you want.

I picked Darwin (actually darwin) because that is the name that the  
operating system identifies itself with.  The output of uname -a is:

Darwin BookWormMac.local 9.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.8.0: Wed Jul 15  
16:55:01 PDT 2009; root:xnu-1228.15.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386

All versions of MacOS X have reported as Darwin.  Darwin is not a name  
like Cheetah, Puma, Jaguar, Panther, Tiger, Leopard, and Snow Leopard,  
which are used to identify different releases of MacOS X.

Wikipedia says:
"Darwin is an open source POSIX-compliant computer operating system  
released by Apple Inc. in 2000. It is composed of code developed by  
Apple, as well as code derived from NeXTSTEP, BSD, and other free  
software projects.

Darwin forms the core set of components upon which Mac OS X, Apple TV,  
and iPhone OS are based. It is compatible with the Single UNIX  
Specification version 3 (SUSv3) and POSIX UNIX applications and  
utilities."

I may be naive, but I feel it is as stable as Debian or Ubuntu.   
Actually more stable than Ubuntu because Darwin is older by about 4  
years.  An interesting side note, while Mac OS X has only supported  
intel processors since January, 2006 (10.4.4), Darwin has supported  
intel processors since 2000.

If you still want me to change it, I will defer to your greater  
expertise and experience.

Bruce
On Apr 1, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:00 PM, CVBruce <cvbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm also working on building the install package from the command  
>>> line
>>> so that build a new package from a make file.  So far I've put the
>>> scripts that are required and other bits and pieces in platform/ 
>>> unix/
>>> darwin.  Is that a good place, or should I be putting it someplace  
>>> else?
>>
>> That relative location sounds good, but I have reservations about the
>> darwin name, since the name
>> might change without necessarily any of the files changing.  Maybe
>> something more generic like mac?
>
> Yeah, I also think a more generic name is better.  mac seems  
> reasonable to me.
>
> --
> Mark Miesfeld
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to