On 19.03.2011 21:49, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > > Why do you clear the condition before you you decode it? > Hmm, good question. Probably, because I assume that otherwise further interactions with the Rexx interpreter would not be possible with a pending condition. (E.g. this is the case with Java AFAIK.)
> Without looking at code, can't say for sure, but that seems risky. > How do you know clearing the condition doesn't set program to null? > Well, it usually works. This code will just create a Rexx-like error message to use as explanatory exception text for creating a Java exception. If dispatching Rexx scripts from Java, the Java side has been getting all information so far. It is the first time that I heard of a RexxStringObject to be NULL (had never expected that). Of course these assumptions could be misconceptions of mine, but then the documentation is not clear about it. ---rony ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
