On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I know that you're thinking about the lower level now, but consider an
> array of directories as then one can refer to columns by name. I know
> there are some interfaces (like windows ADODBC, and I seem to recall JDBC
> was a bit like this) where you have to work really hard to fetch each row,
> and then you have to work really hard to fetch each field from the row. It
> feels a whole lot more rexxish to me to be able to say
>
> osql~exec(myQuery)
>
> do row over osql~rows
> if row['name'] = 'Smith' then do ... end
> end
>
>
Well, I think the above is close to what I have now:
results = osql~exec(myQuery)
do row over results
if row[2] = 'Smith' then do ... end
end
What I was saying was that it wouldn't be too hard at this point to let the
user specify if the returned result set was an array of arrays or an array
of directory objects.
--
Mark Miesfeld
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
