On 19.08.2012 15:58, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
> <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> On 19.08.2012 15:44, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>> Or differently asked: is it possible for a running executable
>> (method or routine object)
>> to get the
>> name that was used to invoke it (very much like being able to get at
>> the object's current
>> arguments
>> or current variables)?
>>
>>
>> No, that's not currently a method of the RexxContext class
> Should I open a RFE for this?
>
>
> Only if you want this to actually get implemented some time. That's the only
> way to get something
> like this in the queue of things to be worked on, unless you're willing to do
> it yourself and
> submit a patch.
O.K. will open an RFE.
Ad patch: interesting idea, did not think about it at all! Unfortunately,
currently, I am heavily in
"land under water mode" due to a (book) project and won't have the time to
research how to get
access to the routine's or method's name and experiment with that code area.
But good to know about
this option, once I can come back to it (would first create a patch for
including the bitness
information into the parse source string as that is nowadays very important for
installation purposes).
---rony
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
