Rick McGuire <[email protected]> wrote: >On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:15 AM, hakan <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I think it's not consistent with >> Do s over array >> say s >> end
> These are fundamentally different constructs. Do Over actually requests a > new version from the collection which is defined as being non-sparse. That sounds to me like a colossally inefficient thing to do - are you really saying that for do/over there's a second copy of the array created (and then destroyed?)? -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
