On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Walter Pachl <christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
> wrote:

>
> Is my delta  (16 vs. 17) of any use?
>


Walter,

I don't have the time to go through your delta line by line.  But I thought
I'd clarify a few things that caught my eye:

"NEW-> Returns an array of all indices contained in the table"

Both indexes and indices are correct spellings.  We talked about this some
years ago and decided to always go with indexes.

"OLD-> >>-hasItem(value)----------------------------------------------><
 OLD-> Returns 1 (true) if the collection contains the value at any index
position

 NEW-> >>-hasItem(item)-----------------------------------------------><
 NEW-> Returns 1 (true) if the collection contains the item at any index
position

            why different (item vs. value)???"

Item and value are synonymous here.  You can say "I want to get the value
at index 'x'"  or you can say "I want to get the item at index 'x'"  The
both mean the same thing.  The text within the () is a variable name.
"value" is just as good a variable name as "item" is.

There is therefore no *compelling* reason to change the text.

In general, I'm not even sure what your delta means.  It would seem that
you are saying that section 5.3.16 should be changed to 5.3.17??  There are
2 different things being documented.  In 5.3.16 the Table class is being
documented.  In 5.3.17, the IndentityTable is being documented.  They
should have different text.

Now there could be copy and paste errors in section 5.3.17, but when I look
at the reference doc, I don't see any.

--
Mark Miesfeld
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to