On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:54:43 -0600 David Ashley <w.david.ash...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not saying that we should not process the SIGHUP signal. We > should process it. But that leads us to the next two choices. > > 1. The interpreter safely terminate the script without passing the > signal on to the user. > > 2. We pass the signal on to the user and let them perform their own > termination processing. > Ok, we agree SIGHUP (and signals in general) should be handled. 1. is out if we want to make it possible for the script to gracefully shut itself down. Would it be an idea to have a special function (*nix only, otherwise it will be ignored) which turns on 'strict signal handling' (to give it a name) for signal on halt? Then we would be downward compatible, and those having a special need (i.e. they need to do some cleanup processing) could make use of that function. -- Manfred ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
