I would value a separate method for the name of the routine or method. I
would be happy to parse it out of the directive line text or perhaps it
should have it's own separate method.
Jon
On Jul 4, 2014 12:35 PM, "Rony G. Flatscher" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> On 04.07.2014 12:33, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> ... cut ...
>
> > Another option would be to add a separate method to get the directive
> source line. That is a
> > little more work, but also doable. The advantage of doing that is the
> information would also be
> > there for native routines and methods. Actually, now that I write that,
> I think I'm starting to
> > lean in that direction. Anyway, I'd like some opinions on this.
> +1
>
> ---rony
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
