I'd call it PROLOG in line with the new ::OPTIONS PROLOG
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Rick McGuire <[email protected]> wrote:
> I keep finding these little cleanup features to add. Currently, if you
> create a package object, you can get access to everything about the package
> EXCEPT that main section of code before the first directive. This is
> pretty easy to add, but what should we call the method? Do we want to call
> it "MAIN"? The ::OPTIONS directive has had PROLOG/NOPROLOG options added
> to control whether that gets called at load time. Should we call it
> PROLOG? Something else? I'm leaning toward MAIN right now, but I'm not
> terribly tied to that if someone has a better suggestion.
>
> Rick
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rick McGuire <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:09 PM
> Subject: [oorexx:feature-requests] #638 Allow access to the "main" part of
> a package object.
> To: Ticket 638 <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> ** [feature-requests:#638] Allow access to the "main" part of a package
> object. **
>
> **Status:** unread
> **Milestone:** None
> **Created:** Mon Oct 13, 2014 05:09 PM UTC by Rick McGuire
> **Last Updated:** Mon Oct 13, 2014 05:09 PM UTC
> **Owner:** nobody
>
> When you create or load a package object, it would sometimes be desirable
> to access the "main" section of code as a routine object. Every other
> element of the package can be accessed.
>
>
> ---
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
