Erich,
Thanks for the updated documentation. I especially like the *NEW*
highlighting which makes it very easy to find all the new features in
5.0.0. I noticed that the StringTable class should also be marked as
*NEW* as that was not in 4.2.0. If I spot any others, I'll let you know.
As to the "name" for the syntactic sugar for array creation, I agree
with Rick that "Array term" seems appropriate. Thanks for all your hard
work so far!
On 9/28/2015 6:49 AM, Erich Steinböck wrote:
I've just committed documentation for [feature-requests:#613]
<https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/613/> and uploaded
a new rexxref5.pdf build
<https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/5.0.0alpha/> to
the files section. This new rexxref build temporarily marks new,
added 5.0 documentation sections with "*NEW*" to make it easier to see
what has changed from 4.2.
As always, any suggestions are welcome. Specifically I'd like to get
your feedback for the naming of this feature request. After reading
1.11. Terms, Expressions, and Operators I decided to go for "Array
term" - see section 1.11.6.
Should we stick to that? Or use "Array expression" (although
technically probably wrong)? "Array notation (would we then need to
define the term "notation")? "Array syntax"? What do you feel?
Erich
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Gil Barmwater
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
