On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Erich Steinböck <[email protected] > wrote:
> We currently have Serializable.orx in trunk, two methods readObject and > writeObject in CircularQueue class, and dependencies to Serializable.orx > in CMakeLists.txt. See also [feature-requests:#566 > <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/566/>] > > What should be the action for 5.0? > Remove all above? > Yes, I think they should all be removed. > (If so, is there anything I should do, so that Serializable.orx isn't > lost forever after I remove it from trunk?) > Deleting a file from svn does not remove it from the respository. It can still be retrieved from the trunk history. Rick > > > Erich > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Rick McGuire <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Update missed in the Windows make file to remove Serializable.orx >> dependency. I'll take care of that. >> >> Rick >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Rick McGuire <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Building now.... >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Moritz Hoffmann <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA256 >>>> >>>> I removed the serialization support from the branch in revision 9670. >>>> It compiles fine on Linux, would be great if someone running Windows >>>> could confirm this. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> M >>>> >>>> On 12/10/2013 04:47 PM, Moritz Hoffmann wrote: >>>> > As a first step, I added an RFE >>>> > https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/566/ to track >>>> > progress. I now remove the changes from the branch, it shouldn't >>>> > be much effort. >>>> > >>>> > Moritz >>>> > >>>> > On 12/10/2013 04:27 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: >>>> >> Darn, I hadn't noticed that code was in there. I'm not really >>>> >> comfortable leaving that code in there, because I'm not >>>> >> convinced it won't required changes that might require breaking >>>> >> future compatibility. I think this needs to be removed from the >>>> >> release branch. Is it much of a deal to remove it? Let me know >>>> >> if I can assist with any of the removal. >>>> > >>>> >> I think we can leave it in trunk and ensure it gets more of a >>>> >> workout and full docs+test suite additions. >>>> > >>>> >> Rick >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Moritz Hoffmann >>>> >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Hi all, looking at recent changes in SVN I noticed I once added >>>> >> basic support for serializing and deserializing objects in >>>> >> ooRexx (ages ago!) The support consists of the following >>>> >> changes: >>>> > >>>> >> * Addition of the Serializable class to provide read/writeObject >>>> >> methods. * Addition of SerializeFunctions class to >>>> >> serialize/deserialize Rexx objects. * Let core classes inherit >>>> >> from Serializable and add default serialization behavior. >>>> > >>>> >> The issue with the code is that there is hardly any >>>> >> documentation and no tests. As we're approaching a new release I >>>> >> think there should be a decision on whether to include it >>>> >> officially, or remove it. The additions could be kept in a >>>> >> branch, until I/a volunteer finds time to do the documentation >>>> >> and testing effort. >>>> > >>>> >> Otherwise, I'd try to find time during the next weeks to >>>> >> document the changes and come up with tests. >>>> > >>>> >> What is your opinion about this? >>>> > >>>> >> Best, Moritz >>>> >>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
