On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Mike Cowlishaw <m...@speleotrove.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> One other point I should probably make related to this is that the
> referencing operator (currently spelled "&")   ...
>
>
> I trust that spelling is still considered an open issue.  :-)
>
> I'm warming to using '>' on both sides .. at least it implies some sort of
> movement/look elsewhere.   My second choice would be '*' (as in C).
>

I could live with '>'. I'm probably as opposed to using '*' as you are to
'&' :-)

>
> All other characters and character combinations that are currently not
> valid as prefix operations could be possibilities, with the exception of
> '&'...
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to