Hmmm, I see that a number of routines that used to be in oodCommon.cpp got
moved to ooShapesAid.cpp. Perhaps this needs to be a dependency of
ooDialog.dll as well.

Rick

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:45 PM Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm seeing ooShapes.dll getting built and getting a lot of linkage errors
> from the ooDialog.dll link step when it tries to link to routines in
> ooShapes.dll. Is that what you are referring to? The ooShapes.exp file only
> exports the RexxGetPackage entry point, so I'm no surprised they are not
> found. Either these routines all need to be added to the .def file to be
> exported, or possible ShapesAid.obj was intended to be linked into the
> ooDialog.dll as well as ooShapes.dll. I'm not at all sure I understand why
> Mark decided these needed to be moved into a different dll in the first
> place.
>
> Rick
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 3:25 PM Erich Steinböck <
> erich.steinbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've branched our 5.0 trunk into my sandbox/erich/trunk-ood-242 (242 is a
>> typo, should have been 424 of course), and updated it from the latest
>> stand-alone ooDialog 4.2.4 code and samples.
>>
>> The new ood 4.2.4 has refactored some code into an ooShapes DLL.  I've
>> tried to update CMakeLists.txt for the required changes, but I seem to be
>> missing some CMake magic how to correctly build ooShapes.dll.
>>
>> Can someone please have a look what's wrong?  Direct updates to my
>> sandbox are fine, too.
>> Thanks!!
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to