On 01.10.2018 19:30, Erich Steinböck wrote: > As this change also didn't fix Rony's issue, I'll clear the mail forwarding > field again. Rony, do > you agree? Yes let us try whether clearing it has an effect (other than removing bothering duplicates for the committers).
---rony > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:21 PM Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com > <mailto:object.r...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > Now I remember why we disabled the mailing list forwarding. The > committers always would get > notified for all activity, so we got TWO copies of all updates if we were > subscribed to the > list and we would get this error for any updates we made if we were not > subscribed to the list. > > Rick > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: <oorexx-bugs-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:oorexx-bugs-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net>> > Date: Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:17 AM > Subject: [oorexx:bugs] #1560 exposing stems > To: <bigr...@users.sourceforge.net <mailto:bigr...@users.sourceforge.net>> > > > Your message has been rejected, probably because you are not > subscribed to the mailing list and the list's policy is to prohibit > non-members from posting to it. If you think that your messages are > being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at > oorexx-bugs-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:oorexx-bugs-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net>. > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Rick McGuire <bigr...@users.sourceforge.net > <mailto:bigr...@users.sourceforge.net>> > To: oorexx-b...@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:oorexx-b...@lists.sourceforge.net> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 15:17:01 -0000 > Subject: [oorexx:bugs] #1560 exposing stems > > * *status*: open --> invalid > * *Comment*: > > That is exactly the way use arg is supposed to work. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *[bugs:#1560] <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1560/> exposing > stems* > > *Status:* invalid > *Group:* 5.0.0 > *Created:* Mon Oct 01, 2018 02:57 PM UTC by Matthé van der Lee > *Last Updated:* Mon Oct 01, 2018 02:57 PM UTC > *Owner:* nobody > > The following snippet apparenty sets the variables A.0, A.1 and A.3: > > drop a. > x = .ginger~new(a.) > do i = 1 to a.0 > say x a.i > end > > ::class ginger public > ::method init > expose stem. > use strict arg stem. > stem.1 = 'bread' > stem.3 = 'ale' > stem.0 = 3 > self~init:super > return > > While most convenient, I wonder if this is intended as designed. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
