No good reason that I know of other than history.
Rick
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:35 AM Erich Steinböck <erich.steinbo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Running this code "obviously" returns 1.2
> say .StringTable~of((1.2, 1.2))~1.2(1.2, 1.2)
>
> While I just for fun made this cryptic to qualify for the riddle of the
> day, and I understand that this behavior is documented ("The *messageargs*
> argument is ignored.") I don't like that arguments are silently ignored.
>
> Is there a good reason for the current unknown behavior?
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
