Yes, I object to the removal. Including the revision number information is a helpful tool for problem determination. I much prefer Enrico's suggestion to enhance this to obtain the revision number from other sources as well.
Rick On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:18 AM René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > I am maintaining a docker image based on Arch linux that contains LSPF and > ooRexx 5.0.0. I just tried to rebuild that because of the impending > symposium and had spurious behavior from svn on SourceForge (truncated http > response bodies blablabla) and I could not fix that quickly. > > So I decided to put up a copy on Github which works brilliantly. But … and > here it comes… CmakeLists.txt has a hard dependency on Subversion and does > an 'svn info' which breaks the build from git, as that is not an svn > working copy. > > I cannot see the rationale for this. Took it out and the build succeeds. > Does anybody mind if I take that out of the svn repository CMakeLists.txt > also? > > best regards, > > René. > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexxemail@example.com > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexxfirstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel