rexxref documents the new MutableBuffer method []= with three args,
including the pad, in the brackets.

The supposedly equivalent replaceAt() method does have the pad as its last

But []= doesn't actually accept the third pad argument and the source code
has a comment "this is just replaceAt with the default pad".

Do we treat this as a doc bug? Do we want []= to be without pad?
Oorexx-devel mailing list

Reply via email to