Gil: that is really a *great* achievement, thank you very much for all of your efforts! This is really great for the ooRexx project!
Whenever you want "nit-picking" feedback, please let us know, the overall documentation is looking very professional and attractive already! Also, whenever you are ready to share how you did this and what we need to do to do that also, I will try to create the documenation as well. This will allow us to try to help with the documentation as we would become able to test whether our changes would lead to successful creation and attractive documentation, relieving Rick and Erich in that corner a bit! Best regards, ---rony On 16.12.2019 16:40, Gil Barmwater wrote: > > As a result of Jon's request, I have now done the RxMath PDF as well. Doing > another document > helped me formalize the process so that I can automate it and it identified > another small issue > which I thought had been corrected. You can download the PDF here > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/82yxqei5ucvub9e/rxmath.pdf?dl=0> for comparison to > the rxmath.pdf that > is in the docs folder of your 5.0.0 ooRexx installation or the Files section > on SourceForge. The > differences I found are 1) the Copyright dates on the second page now show > -2019, and 2) the flow > of the text in some sections is slightly different due to extra blank lines > in the code examples. > This issue was identified and fixed by Erich with a preprocess Rexx program > when building our docs > using Publican so it can be adapted to my process if I am unable to find the > cause and change it. > His program also needed to fix blank lines in the Index area but that looked > OK to me in my build. > Comments welcome. > > Gil >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
