Dear Bill,
On 09.03.2020 03:11, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote:
> Rony, thank you for catching the fact that my message only went to you, and
> thank you for
> forwarding it on to the entire list.
did not forward it, just tried to make you aware of it. Now, that you thought I
did forward it to
this list, here it goes: :)
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] RFB: rexxpg book: changed rexxc
documentation
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 13:41:10 -0400
From: Bill Turner, WB4ALM <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Organization: Amateur Radio Station WB4ALM
To: Rony G. Flatscher <[email protected]>
Rony, the revised wording read "okay" but somewhere, my mind stumbled a
little -- I had a
student of mine read it, and they thought the word "the" should be added as
we did in the
following example (in green).
Binary files produced by a version of rexxc can only be run on an
interpreter of the
same or higher language level and
the same bitness as the interpreter that the compiling copy of
rexxc was supplied with.
Don't know if that is good (or proper) english or not, but it seemed
slightly better to us!
Rick: Thanks for the clairification, and the attempt to improve
release-to-release compatibility
- This is MUCH appreciated.
to ALL: EXCELLENT JOB in creating the new documentation, and in using
"more betterer and
updated/supported tools" (sic) as well!!!
Now on a personal level, I just need to understand how you
really made it
work... <grin>
- - -
Now if only I could get the REXXMOD package to work on my system...
...but that is a different issue, and I must be doing something wrong,
'cause I can't get it work (and my knowledge of LINUX and Apache isn't
deep enough apparently.)
/s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm
Cheers
---rony
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
