>
> The thing with not being able to revert to an older version of ooRexx is a
> murkier business. I do not think it is related to this change, I just had not
> noticed since I always build a newer version.
>
This is a just a thought, but is there ANY possibility that rexx -v reports
the wrong version due to some unfortunate cashing? When removing one version
and installing another? The problem is the same on Fedora (both rpm builds), it
will keep the highest number (or the first number , not sure).
Any idea on how to confirm/reject this hypothesis?
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
