> Am 07.03.2021 um 18:16 schrieb Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com>:
> 
> I found the old thread from 2018 which discussed the last time we updated the 
> required version number. I think leaving the other CMake.txt files as 2.6 was 
> just an oversight and they should also have been updated to 2.8 at that time. 
> However, I would not be at all opposed to bumping everything to 3.12 so that 
> all of the conditional logic for the MAC can be removed. We considered at 
> that time jumping to 3.0, but I couldn't find anything in in the mail thread 
> that discussed why we settled on 2.0. Surely 3 years later a higher version 
> would be acceptable. 
> 
> Rick
> 

That would be even better, I can make a test locally on macOS and some Linuxes 
and see if there are any side effects.

> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:06 PM Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:object.r...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I'm currently running 3.11.4 for my Windows build, I can easily upgrade to a 
> new version if needed. The last time I bumped the version level higher, there 
> was some objections because of some other platforms. I don't recall what the 
> specific objections were. 
> 
> Rick 
> 
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se 
> <mailto:oor...@jonases.se>> wrote:
> I think there is a general agreement that requiring 3.12 for macOS is ok 
> (Jenkins macOS slave is running 3.13.2).
> 
> Now I am more interested to hear what the Windows users have to say - is 
> there any reason NOT to go from 2.6 to 2.8 as the minimum? I would prefer to 
> have the same settings in all CMakelists.txt
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> P.O. Jonsson
> oor...@jonases.se <mailto:oor...@jonases.se>
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 07.03.2021 um 16:57 schrieb CV Bruce <cvbr...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:cvbr...@gmail.com>>:
>> 
>> Whatever. My point was the ready availability of Cmake recent versions for 
>> Mac. When I first built ooRexx V5, Rick told me I needed Version 3 of Cmake, 
>> which was readily available.
>> 
>> Sent by Magic!
>> 
>>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel 
>>> <oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>> <mailto:oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop dmg
>>> Available in the download section at cmake.org <http://cmake.org/>
>>> 
>>> You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal effort 
>>> 
>>> It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into /usr/local
>>> Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur  
>>> 
>>> Now I am using 3.20-rc3
>>> 
>>> I built the APPLE  ooRexx universal binaries  and the test suite runs well 
>>> down to El Capitan
>>> ( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon  builds) 
>>> 
>>> Greetings
>>> 
>>> enrico
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce <cvbr...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:cvbr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which 
>>>> is why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6. 
>>>> Fink is 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
>>>> I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.
>>>> 
>>>> Sent by Magic!
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck <mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com 
>>>>> <mailto:mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Greetings P.O.
>>>>> 
>>>>> P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>>>>>> This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which 
>>>>>> seems to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has 
>>>>> version:
>>>>> 
>>>>> [ Source: cmake  ]
>>>>> Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather 
>>>>> than 2.6.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am thankful,
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Michael Lueck
>>>>> Lueck Data Systems
>>>>> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ <http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>>>> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>>>>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>>> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>>>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel>
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to