On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 12:35 PM Erich Steinböck <erich.steinbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> problems getting the configuration for the semaphores to work correctly >> > There really aren't a lot of configuration options any more. I just > recently cleaned up the SysSempahore code with revision 12259. > And I now believe that we cannot run at all without both > pthread_mutexattr_settype and PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE so I might as well > remove that option too (all of our platforms that we currently run builds > on have support for those.) > I'm fairly certain that we can't run without PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE. Rick > > Thomas, are you at revision 12259 or later? If not can you please update? > > The last time you reported the CMake status of the various pthread > functionality, you showed some "failed" > -- Looking for pthread.h > -- Looking for pthread.h - found > -- Looking for pthread_mutexattr_settype > -- Looking for pthread_mutexattr_settype - not found > -- Looking for pthread_mutex_timedlock > -- Looking for pthread_mutex_timedlock - not found > -- Performing Test HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK > > *-- Performing Test HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK - Failed *-- Performing > Test HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE > -- Performing Test HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE - Failed > What's the current status? > > To test the actual mutex functionality on Android, can you compile and run > this test? > > https://android.googlesource.com/platform/system/extras/+/froyo/tests/bionic/libc/bionic/test_mutex.c > Please also test whether " #define __USE_UNIX98 1" is required to > successfully compile/run. > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
