Since the documentation was not built it was outdated when Windows was built,

I will fix this, will take one hour.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se



> On 23. Dec 2022, at 15:13, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at> wrote:
> 
> Just downloaded the new 64-bit windows build that includes unfortunately the 
> *wrong* documentation.
> 
> It looks as if the build process picks up the documentation from 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta/ 
> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta/> 
> instead of 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/5.0.0_Release_Candidate/
>  
> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/5.0.0_Release_Candidate/>.
> 
> So I would suggest to do the following to remedy the situation:
> 
> delete "oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta/"
> rename "oorexx-docs/5.0.0_Release_Candidate/" to "oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta/"
> change the three files in main/branches/5.0.0 to trigger a new build of the 
> installation packages
> @P.O.: would that be o.k. for you? Can you change the documentation 
> generation script to work from trunk from now on and upload to 
> "oorexx-docs/5.1.0beta"?
> 
> ---rony
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to