Hi Gil I think our mails crossed, Just for the understanding of how the upload works.
The uploading script look at sourceforge and keep 5 copies of all installers. This means that until we have had 5 commits there will be some 5.0.0 installers still in the queue (we started 5.1.0. with no installers so all the local ones were uploaded the first time). This can easily be fixed, I will manually remove all “Artifacts” with a build nr 12583 and earlier. The additional problem is the feature that the installer for many *nix platforms is actually tested (a clever part that Erich provided), but the name of the item installed is hardcoded to 5.0.0 (that I am now changing to 5.1.0), for the future this should be controlled by a variable in some way. Regarding the Windows installer it is made from this command nmake nsis_template_installer I have no knowledge of this template so someone on Win should maybe have a look to make sure we are getting the naming right also for Windows. I will amend the macOS installer build routine if necessary. Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, P.O. Jonsson oor...@jonases.se > On 28. Dec 2022, at 15:40, Gilbert Barmwater <gi...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > P.O., > > I noticed this morning a bunch of new files "released" on SF, both documents > and builds. I assume these were triggered by 12588 that you recently > committed. However there is a problem with the naming of the builds. Here is > an example: /oorexx/5.1.0beta/ooRexx-5.0.0-12558.linuxmint20.x86_64.deb > Note the 5.0.0 in the file name. Hopefully this is easy to fix. > > Gil > > On 12/27/2022 8:19 AM, ooRexx wrote: >> Dear Gil, >> >> Sorry for the lagging reply, I have been AFK for a while. >> >> Thanks for the offer, I can get (parts of) the 4.2 documentation from the >> Win installer on sourceforge but it would not be the complete set since the >> Unix/Linux documents are not there. Instead I downloaded the source and >> could successfully build the 4.2 documentation, which is the most important >> (after 5.0.0) I think. It gave me the possibility to improve my scripts >> somewhat :-) >> >> We should be thinking of how to deliver also the *nixes with documentation. >> Even the macOS before 5.0.0 lack the documentation. >> >> The documentation before 4.2 I could not rebuild, it has a different layout, >> I would probably have to revive Publican again. >> >> I thought I had found the documentation back on the Wayback machine >> <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj3yKX375n8AhW3SPEDHeebAZ0QFnoECAkQAQ&url=https://archive.org/web/&usg=AOvVaw1olZ8IYxs_xjPuf-Ft5fso> >> Everything appeared to be there. Alas, what was stored was the link to the >> “Your Download will start in 5 seconds…” script so no actual data was >> present, just the layout so to speak. >> >> I hope there is a backup on Sourceforge, I have not yet heard from the >> support there. >> >> I am upgrading the Jenkins system today and will start it later tonight. >> >> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, >> ooRexx >> oor...@jonases.se <mailto:oor...@jonases.se> >> >> >> >>> On 26. Dec 2022, at 02:04, Gilbert Barmwater <gi...@bellsouth.net >>> <mailto:gi...@bellsouth.net>> wrote: >>> >>> I have 4.2.0 for Windows 64 bit installed which has the included PDFs. Let >>> me know if you need them. >>> >>> Gil >>> >>> On 12/25/2022 6:03 PM, ooRexx wrote: >>>> I have some god news and some bad news >>>> >>>> The good news: >>>> >>>> FreeBSD is now revision 12583, I rebuilt it manually >>>> macOS is also 12583, but now with the correct documentation >>>> Ubuntu22 has been renamed to Ubuntu2204 (to indicate LTS version) >>>> >>>> I set the date to 2022-12-23 so all installers have the same date (except >>>> Ubuntu for S390X, still revision 12506) >>>> >>>> The proposed download for Windows is Windows 64 bit, >>>> The proposed download for macOS now 5.0.0, not 4.1 >>>> The proposed download for BSD is FreeBSD >>>> I did not indicate any Linux default since we have several platforms >>>> >>>> The bad news: My FTP client played me a trick and erased the entire >>>> oorexx-docs when I ordered it to delete oorexx-docs/5.0.0beta :-( >>>> >>>> I recreated oorexx-docs and uploaded 5.0.0 again and I have asked on >>>> Sourceforge to get the other folders back from a backup but I guess they >>>> are not so active over Christmas >>>> >>>> If anyone have copies of at least the latest version of the documentation >>>> for version 4 I would like to have a copy so I can upload it. >>>> >>>> If nothing else works I will rebuild it manually from source. >>>> >>>> Rony asked that no changes be made to the documentation right now, he >>>> wanted to do something first. >>>> >>>> I will reactivate Jenkins build system from trunk tomorrow. >>>> >>>> >>>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, >>>> ooRexx >>>> oor...@jonases.se <mailto:oor...@jonases.se> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list >>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >>>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Oorexx-devel mailing list >>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel> > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
