Thank you (and also Gil) for all of your efforts!

On 03.01.2023 00:18, ooRexx wrote:
My attempt to always have the documentation built before windows and macOS build backfired. "monitoring" the documentation build resulted in Windows and macOS building as soon as there was a change to the documentation, also when there is no change to the source codebase. So I have reverted that change.

The other way around, to have Windows and/or initiating a documentation build for every source code change might work (the documentation build will exit silently if there are no changes) but I think it will eventually lead to problems. In the normal situation the documentation will be fairly stable so ready to be picked up. For a release scenario we might need to be a bit more disciplined and let a couple of hours pass between documentation changes and final build. I hope this is acceptable.

One possibility is to use "tools/svnListRevisions.rex" exactly as "tools/updateEntityValues.rex" to determine if a book's part got updated (ignoring the ${book}/en-US/${book}.ent and ${book}/en-US/Author_Group.xml files) and only recreate and upload that book if so.

I have amended the script building and uploading the documentation to accept download and upload paths, so that is can be driven by cMake when we know how to use that as variables.

One possibility would be to place an ooRexx property text file containing current build definitions at a location that can be read from all Jenkins-clients. If it does not exist a fallback would be to use trunk only.

Such a textfile could look like:

   main=5.1.0beta
   docs=5.0.0 5.1.0beta
   test=5.1.0beta

with the meaning create ooRexx 5.1.0beta (main-entry), the documenation for 5.0.0 and 5.1.0beta (docs-entry), run the tests for 5.1.0beta from 5.1.0beta.

Or something like that.

The location could be on SourceForge and a backup location accessible from each Jenkins client (if that can be configured).

This is just one idea meant for further brainstorming! :)


Along the same lines I have written yet a rexx script that checks if any changes have been made to docs-bildutils, and if so, update the "Files" section of sourceforge so that we now have an automated way to update also docs-bildutils
+1
The script is launched from the Project ooRexx-docs-bildutils-check and hopefully we can provide the necessary input to the script from CMakeLists.txt in a later stage.

I did only consider files so far, I have a question on the folders *rexxpg 
bldoc_win bldoc_orx*

*rexxpg* only contain two files so it is doable to download them using the enerving "wait five seconds" downloading function but for*bldoc_win* and *bldoc_orx* (what is the difference)

AFAIK "bldoc_orx" is the newer version using Rexx scripts instead of the shell scripts in "bldoc_win", thereby allowing it to be used on Unix systems as well. However, Gil knows more as he is the author! :)

there are some 20 separate files and folders, making downloading it a nightmare. I suggest to put everything together as a zipfile, in that way it is a one-click to get it.

The files under version control should remain as it makes it easy to directly 
work with them.

OTOH the files put into the unversioned files area of Sourceforge can be in the zipped form, as it is really easier for downloading.

The folder publican_obsolete is just that, obsolete, so I do not expect anyone to use it but it is kept for backwards compatibility.

The question is whether anyone is able and wants to re-create older documentation. We could remove "publican_obsolete" from trunk as it still would be present in the older releases branches.

While being there we should also consider to rename the directory "docs/trunk/oorexx" to "docs/trunk/Common_Content" as it gets used for all books. After doing so, we should also consider to change all the xml-files that refer to "Common_Content" to refer relatively to it which would allow us to forgo copying "oorexx\en-US" into all "books\en-US\Common_Content".

In the coming days I will go through the list and see what is missing on my part and delete/summarize those sections.

+1

---rony

_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to