Just another update in the developer list such that readers know: in
<https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/815/> Erich has pointed to his RFE
<https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/689/> (which I was not aware of anymore) which
brought the revision information into the version string.
For some reasons I got the impression from comments over time that an official release should not
carry any specific revision information in the package names and "rexx[c] -v" which caused me to
check out the possibility to do that and which yielded RFE:#815 and the patch.
As personally I am fine with keeping the revision information in the relased package names and
"rexx[c] -v" I will not proceed with RFE #815 any further.
---rony
On 06.01.2023 16:37, Michael Lueck wrote:
Greetings ooRexx'ers,
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
say .rexxinfo~revision
will always give you the revision that was in place when the package got
created.
Not showing the revision number on "rexx -v" is meant to indicate that it is an official release
version and not an interim build.
In that case, given the availability of .rexxinfo~revision will always be supported, I would be
fine with removing the precise version from "rexx -v".
I appreciate you explaining.
I am thankful,
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
