Um...both your links point to 5.0.0? Leslie
On 2025-03-11 15:21:25 Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 10.03.2025 20:44, Michael Lueck wrote: > > Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > >> Hi Michael, > >> > >> could you please run your programs against 5.0.0 or 5.1.0 and report > >> about your findings? > >> > >> (It may be the case that the slowness you report has gone.) > > > > Certainly! > > > > I currently have this build on my machine: > > > > > > $rexx -v > > Open Object Rexx Version 5.0.0 r12583 > > Build date: Dec 23 2022 > > Addressing mode: 64 > > > > > > Is that an acceptable version, or should I switch versions? (I suspect I > > did update to a stable release of the 5.0 version.... not sure, been too > > long.) > > That would be an acceptable version. However, you could use the official > build for your operating system from: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/5.0.0/ > > Also, please note: starting with ooRexx 5.0 it becomes possible to have > multiple different versions of ooRexx 5.0 or later available on the same > machine as each version will use a different rxapi. The portable versions > of ooRexx 5.0.0 can be found at: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/5.0.0/portable/ > > In addition you could use the latest versions of 5.1.0 beta from > <https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/5.0.0/portable/>. > However please note, that at the moment P.O. is doing some tests such that > you should come back to this version after P.O. announced availability > again (expected today, if I read his post correctly). > > HTH > > ---rony _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
