The revision number shouldn't matter, as far as I know. It was the current one when I uploaded the patches.
Regarding the paths, the instruction set I'm following reads Once you are ready with the intended changes, *go up to the root of the documentation* and issue "svn diff > myPatchForChapter3.1.2.diff" which will write all the changes to that text file. Submit that diff-file (patch-file) as a patch[...] Maybe the boldfaced part explains the difference? Josep Maria Missatge de Sahananda <[email protected]> del dia dv., 24 d’oct. 2025 a les 10:47: > I would also be interested in an answer to this. I tried creating a patch > locally and noted these differences from Josep Maria's patch. > > The file references did not have paths. > My Working copy was at revision 13031 whilst Josep Maria's was at 13026 > I also note that Josep Maria's patch which contained directory information > used '/' as the path separator. > > Jon > > > > My Header > >> Index: intro.xml >> =================================================================== >> --- intro.xml (revision 13031) >> +++ intro.xml (working copy) > > > Josep Maria's Header > >> Index: trunk/rexxref/en-US/intro.xml >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/rexxref/en-US/intro.xml (revision 13026) >> +++ trunk/rexxref/en-US/intro.xml (working copy) > > > > > > On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 at 08:15, ooRexx <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I wanted to apply the patches proposed by Josep Maria but failed >> miserably to do so. I have now applied the changes indicated in >> doc_bug_326.diff manually and that worked so there is nothing wrong with my >> SVN. I nevertheless would like to know why the patch did not work. Here is >> what I did: >> >> % cd /Users/jenkins/ooRexxSVN-Code-0/docs/trunk/rexxref/en-US >> % svn update >> Aktualisiere ».«: >> Revision 13031. >> % svn patch /Users/jenkins/Downloads/doc_bug_326.diff >> C trunk/rexxref/en-US/instrc.xml >> > Abschnitt @@ -2081,9 +2081,8 @@ zurückgewiesen >> Konfliktübersicht: >> Textkonflikte: 1 >> >> What am I doing wrong? >> Is the patch not in the correct form? >> Or do I have to perform the patches in a specific order? >> I am on r13031 and the patch was made at r13026, does that make a >> difference? >> >> Here the rejection grounds >> >> --- trunk/rexxref/en-US/instrc.xml >> +++ trunk/rexxref/en-US/instrc.xml >> @@ -2081,9 +2081,8 @@ >> in this case must be either <computeroutput>SCIENTIFIC</computeroutput> >> or >> <computeroutput>ENGINEERING</computeroutput>. You can omit the subkeyword >> VALUE if <emphasis role="italic">expression2</emphasis> does not begin >> with a >> -symbol or a literal string, >> -that is, if it starts with a special character, such as an operator >> character >> -or parenthesis.</para> >> +symbol, that is, if it starts with a string or a special character, >> +such as an operator character or parenthesis.</para> >> <para>You can retrieve the current NUMERIC FORM setting with the >> <xref linkend="bifForm" xrefstyle="select:title"/> built-in function. >> </para> >> >> >> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, >> ooRexx >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
