> That's only partially true. You can make full use of this in a
> TreeView without having user data available. It just, in some cases,
> would make it easier. You are sent the handle to the tree-view item
> that the tip is for, and that is sufficient.
>
>
Not sure that I understand this correctly. In my case the tip would display
information that would be stored as itemData and would be unique for each
item. Even though my current implementation uses tricks to store part of
this information as item text, it's not the ideal place for it, and it
doesn't work in all cases either so I can't think of another way than using
data associated with the item itself to provide that information to
whatever function there is to display it, such as infotip. In any case I
will keep all this in mind when preparing for 4.2.1.
Thanks,
Staffan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-users mailing list
Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
