Mark, do you mind sending me the rexx you are using for testing?

Staffan


On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Mark Miesfeld <miesf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Staffan Tylen <staffan.ty...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>> Mark, this looks very strange indeed. My system is a Vaio Intel i5-2520M
>> 2.5GHz with 6GB RAM and an SSD drive so it's fast! And I still get these
>> high values, I can't understand it. How many columns are there in your test
>> database? It's the large number of columns that causes the performance
>> problem I think, my test db has 149 columns and around 20,000 rows.
>
>
> Staffan,
>
> I built the database using the code you posted.  It has 150 columns and
> 20,000 records.
>
> On several systems I have that have 4 GB of memory, I've run the test and
> collected the timings several hundreds of times.  The timings will vary
> within about 1 second of each other, for the same type of record format.
>
> It is only on the one system that has 1 GB of memory that I get any
> problem.  And, on that system if I only run exec() one time, I never have a
> problem.
>
> Not sure what to suggest here.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-users mailing list
Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users

Reply via email to