On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Staffan Tylen <staffan.ty...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I'm successfully using CALL in place of ::REQUIRES at one point in the
> process because the name of the class to use is not known beforehand. My
> questions are:
>
> - is there a better way of doing it?
>
> - is there a risk it will break in the future?
Probably not much chance this will break in the future, but a better
approach would be to use the loadPackage method.
.context~package~loadPackage(someFileName)
Which performs essentially the same processing as having a ::requires, but
does it dynamically.
Rick
>
>
> Staffan
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-users mailing list
> Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-users mailing list
Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
