Whoops, I didn't see these replies before I sent my last one.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Staffan Tylen <staffan.ty...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Well, I had that in mind but I think that once connect-event is done then
> there is no disconnect-event that can be used while 'flipping' check-all
> between on and off (more than once). I think my issue can be solved if the
> check methods are not treated as events, which IMHO they are not.
>
You are correct in that there is no disconnect-event. Probably never will
be.
The mechanism for intercepting the window event notifications
works surprisingly well. But, the number of messages sent is huge. In a
normal Windows program the program has a specific window procedure that is
crafted to only process the messages it needs.
In ooDialog, the window procedure has to examine every single message and
check to see if it matches the filters set up in a message table. This
needs to be kept very fast, or the whole thing will break down.
It may be your opinion that the Rexx methods checkAll or uncheckAll are not
events. But, the Windows list-view does not share that opinion. The
checkAll Rexx method will cause an item in the underlying list-view to
become checked, and the underlying list-view is always going to report that
event.
--
Mark Miesfeld
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-users mailing list
Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
