On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm in favor of making a final XP release declaration and move on. While
> it could be possible to try dynamically loading any newer API calls, I'm
> not sure it is worth the effort. I'm definitely NOT in favor of locking
> this down the the Windows XP-only level.
Thanks Rick.
For the API I was just talking about, that's exactly what I tried to do.
Dynamically load the API. It worked fine on the 64-bit build on Windows 7
64-bit. But crashed with the 32-bit ooRexx on Windows 64-bit.
I'm pretty sure I just had the linking specification wrong in the typedef
for the function prototype. But, I couldn't seem to get it right, so I
gave up. It is one of the COM Shell APIs
Anyway, even if I did some more research and got the typedef right, it's
just a lot of extra work that could be better spent elsewhere.
--
Mark Miesfeld
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-users mailing list
Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
