Rick is still too quick for me.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Ruurd Idenburg <ru...@idenburg.net> wrote:
> Is it me not understanding, or is the RexxQueue class indeed unusable,
> since none of the class methods returns an instance and therefore none
> of the instance methods can be used?
>
It's your understanding. I haven't used that class much, if at all. So I
looked at the test group for RexxQueue. Here is some code from one test
case:
q = .RexxQueue~new('testQueue')
s = 'test string'
s2 = 'test string2'
q~queue(s)
q~queue(s2)
self~assertEquals(2, q~queued, 'subTest19: Queue 2 adds two lines')
self~assertEquals(s, q~pull, 'subTest20: Queued line correct FIFO')
q~delete
The self~assertEquals is not going to work outside of the test case, but
you should be able to get the idea for q~queued and q~pull.
--
Mark Miesfeld
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-users mailing list
Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
