Mark,

Thank you for the quick reply on the precision.  Sorry for missing the
maximum limit of 16 places.  I honestly didn't see it, while reading
through the documentation (and that is on me).

On the other issue, I'll look at coming up with a similar, but simpler way
of looking at the issue.  Maybe it is normal the same math formula to have
such wildly different performance (e.g. 10X).  I guess it would take longer
to multiple 100 * 101 than 5 * 4.  I just thought it wouldn't be so great
of a difference to cause a 2 hour run to take 26 hours and the precision be
the same (e.g. 30,000).

Yeah, I know Rexx isn't the right language to be doing major math
calculations, such as Pi . . . Right!??

Take care and again thanks for helping on the precision,

Bert.

P.S.  Is there some place where I can read (e.g. maybe a design document or
similar) on how Rexx handles variables internally?  I'm asking as my Pi
program is taking ~2.0 GB of RAM at a numeric precision of 100,000.  Having
this information might allow me to estimate during the design phase how
much physical memory a design under consideration will use -- before
actually having to code it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-users mailing list
Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users

Reply via email to