And there is, of course, Rony’s book: Introduction to Rexx and ooRexx.
See also one of my first attempts at rosettacode.org (trigonometric functions)
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Trigonometric_functions#ooRexx
defining a class, methods, and routines
Criticism/comments/error reports welcome
Walter
Von: Bertram Moshier [mailto:bertrammosh...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 12. Mai 2014 15:44
An: oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: [Oorexx-users] Recommendation for moving from Procedural REXX to
Object Oriented REXX
I know I admitted it awhile back, but not very loudly and certainly not in
anyway suggesting I want to change, but . . . The time is approach, I figure I
should start the learning process to move from procedural REXX to object
oriented REXX, which isn't just learning ooREXX, but also learning object
oriented programming (properly).
Thus I'm asking . . . what is the best way for a guy with 30+ years of
procedural programming who is on disability to learn to program the object
oriented way. I'm open to learning it via Java, which I'm sure I should learn
anyway, but I also want to keep going with REXX, too. :-)
Thank you!
Bert.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-users mailing list
Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users