[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13142742#comment-13142742
 ] 

Mohammad Kamrul Islam commented on OOZIE-592:
---------------------------------------------

I like this JSON object concept. Do we think we need to keep the current 
versioning concept to avoid both forward and backward compatibility?
 
                
> new WF library implementation (lite2)
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-592
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-592
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
>            Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
>
> Current WF library implementation (lite) has the following issues/limitations:
> * Under certain conditions kill/failure all running actions are not being 
> properly killed (leaving things in odd states and/or runaway actions)
> * Exceptions are properly propagated handled
> * start/end/kill/fork/join nodes do not  provide hooks to create entries in 
> the DB in the WF actions table (useful for WF visualization)
> In addition, the following new features would allow more flexible WF 
> programming:
> * support for a SUSPEND node, to programmatically suspend a WF in certain 
> condition.
> * support for SHARD/UNSHARD nodes, similar to FORK/JOIN but it is a single 
> execution lane that gets multiplexed N times
> These 2 new features would be exposed in a new schema.
> The implementation approach for this would be broken down into a few JIRAs:
> * WF lite2 implementation with testcases
> * WF lite2 node handlers
> * WF lite2 service

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to