In general you are free to use whatever release number you want. AFAIK Apache does not impose a release numbering scheme on its projects, though most seem to follow the pattern that we are used to from Hadoop (major.minor.patch). Given that I'd choose whatever you feel will cause your current users and developers the least confusion. 3.1.0 seems to fail that test since some subset of your users are already used to 3.1.3. If Yahoo internal 3.1.3 is the same as what you are releasing, then 3.1.3 seems a good choice. If it's not, I would consider 3.2.0.
Alan. On Jan 27, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > IMO we should be good with 3.1.3 as our first Apache release. > > Thanks. > > Alejandro > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Mohammad Islam <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Oozie Mentors and others, >> We plan to release Oozie for the first time in Apache. >> We need help to determine the release version. >> >> Here is the history timeline: >> 1. Last oozie released from Github was 3.0. >> 2. Yahoo certified version of latest Oozie is 3.1.3 >> >> What should we use as our new release version? >> Option 1: Use 3.1.0 >> Option 2: Use 3.1.3 : will there be any issue with "patch" release as the >> first one in Apache. >> Option 3: 3.2.0 >> >> Regards, >> Mohammad
