On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Mohammad Islam <[email protected]> wrote: > Recently we were going through different naming conventions. Therefore, we > see some duplicates and unnecessary branches/tags. > I will clean those. > > In addition, tag 3.2 was for probable release. > > We will make those things cleaned soon. > Thanks for pointing those out.
Great! For now, though, can you tell me which branches are under active development and which ones do you intend to remove? Also, do any of the existing tags correspond to a more stable set of bits compared to the tip of the branch? Thanks, Roman.
