[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13247343#comment-13247343
]
[email protected] commented on OOZIE-804:
-----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4654/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated 2012-04-05 16:34:14.209961)
Review request for oozie.
Changes
-------
Updated based on comments..thxs
Summary
-------
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-804
This addresses bug oozie-804.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/oozie-804
Diffs (updated)
-----
trunk/core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/action/decision/TestDecisionActionExecutor.java
1309630
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4654/diff
Testing
-------
Thanks,
Virag
> TestDecisionActionExecutor failing due to uninitialized conf
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-804
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Virag Kothari
> Assignee: Virag Kothari
>
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.574 sec <<<
> FAILURE!
> 5 testDecision(org.apache.oozie.action.decision.TestDecisionActionExecutor)
> Time elapsed: 7.422 sec <<< ERROR!
> 6 java.lang.NullPointerException
> 7 at
> org.apache.oozie.action.ActionExecutor.getOozieConf(ActionExecutor.java:293)
> 8 at
> org.apache.oozie.action.ActionExecutor.<init>(ActionExecutor.java:230)
> 9 at
> org.apache.oozie.action.ActionExecutor.<init>(ActionExecutor.java:218)
> 10 at
> org.apache.oozie.action.decision.DecisionActionExecutor.<init>(DecisionActionExecutor.java:39)
> 11 at
> org.apache.oozie.action.decision.TestDecisionActionExecutor.testDecision(TestDecisionActionExecutor.java:143)
> As part of oozie-796, the oozieConf is obtained in the constructor. The
> testcase needs to account for that by initializing the services.
> Also, currently we have surefire-2.7 which doesn't fail the build if the
> testcase 'errors' out. It only fails if the testcase has a 'failure'.
> This problem is solved by using surefire-2.12. However that is done as part
> oozie-783.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
