> On Sept. 4, 2012, 9:54 p.m., Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> > IMO, until WFGEN is functional complete we should not include it in distro 
> > tarball. Also, when we do that, I don't think it should be by default in 
> > the tomcat server used by Oozie server but in a separate one. Wondering if 
> > we should have a separate binary tarball for it. thoughts?
> 
> Ryota Egashira wrote:
>     >I don't think it should be by default in the tomcat server used by Oozie 
> server
>     yes, totally agree, WFGEN is not currently using tomcat server used by 
> oozie, it is bundled with separate tomcat server for isolation. As it matures 
> in future, we need to think of how to integrate into using the same tomcat 
> server.
>     
>     >Wondering if we should have a separate binary tarball for it
>     there are two final artifacts from WFGEN. one is 
> workflowgenerator-3.3.0-SNAPSHOT-tomcat.tar.gz, which bundles separate tomcat 
> server(not the one used by oozie-server) where workflowgenerator.war file is 
> already placed under /webapps, and the other is 
> workflowgenerator-3.3.0-SNAPSHOT.war, which a user can copy to /webapps of 
> their own tomcat server. I changed top-level pom to include two files(tar.gz 
> and war) in final oozie tarball, to avoid extra effort of maintaining 
> separate tarball only for WFGEN.
>

>until WFGEN is functional complete
it is functionally complete as initial version. OOZIE-976 is part of OOZIE-944 
(made it subtask for clarification) and 944 is already committed, sorry for 
confusion.


- Ryota


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6847/#review11035
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 1, 2012, 5:34 a.m., Ryota Egashira wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6847/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 1, 2012, 5:34 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-976
> 
> 
> This addresses bug OOZIE-976.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-976
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   branches/branch-3.3/pom.xml 1379690 
>   branches/branch-3.3/src/main/assemblies/distro.xml 1379690 
>   branches/branch-3.3/workflowgenerator/README.txt 1379690 
>   branches/branch-3.3/workflowgenerator/pom.xml 1379690 
>   
> branches/branch-3.3/workflowgenerator/src/main/assemblies/workflowgenerator.xml
>  1379690 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6847/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> done locally
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ryota Egashira
> 
>

Reply via email to