> On 14 Mar 2015, at 01:04, Louis Gesbert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > OPAM 1.2.1 has been in RC for a week, without any worrying issue reported so > far (the only fix to date is on `switch reinstall`, which didn't lock the > right switch. Not quite a blocker). We'll release early next week unless > something shows up ! >
Green light from me! To be clear, does the 1.2 branch now reflect the final RC version? I can build 1.2.1 RPM/Debs from that. I think we should make a concerted effort to get 1.2.1 upstream into Ubuntu so that it hits the next LTS cycle. Hopefully it isn't too late for the Debian release cycle too... > The discussion on 1.3 seems to have more or less settled on: > 1. Signing the repository > 2. Sandboxing package builds (at least tracking their installed files, to > begin with) > 3. Improving Windows documentation and support > > I've started working in these directions. Since this'll take a while, I'll > maintain a 1.2 branch if backports or updates are necessary. That looks like an excellent summary of the roadmap discussion. -anil _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
