Le lundi 18 janvier 2016, 17:17:11 Daniel Bünzli a écrit : > Le lundi, 18 janvier 2016 à 16:02, Louis Gesbert a écrit : > > ² We heard a complaint about it from Daniel Bünzli, and do not believe it > > to be the general feeling. To make your own informed opinion on it, here > > are the related comments and our answers: > > > > https://github.com/OCamlPro/ocp-indent/pull/192 > > I would also like to add your last answer to this thread is a little bit > disingenuous since we all know who's the major financial backer that is > behind the software.
Jane Street is indeed the major financial backer behind opam, and we are very thankful for that. Most open-source projects are possible thanks to sponsors, and my meaning wasn't that we work for free, which would be nonsense -- I didn't intend my wording to be misleading, so sorry if it was. However, I don't see your point or how it relates to the issue at hand; also note that, leaving aside the consideration of LGPL vs BSD, something should be done to clarify the current situation anyway. Best, Louis _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
