(adding Mark) On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buen...@erratique.ch> wrote:
> > Le mardi, 19 janvier 2016 à 08:56, Roberto Di Cosmo a écrit : > > So, well, first of all, let me totally and deeply disagree on the > cursorily repeated assertions in this thread that imply that GPL is BAD and > BSD is GOOD. This kind of generic self asserting statements are ok among > kids, not grown up persons able to master a sophisticated language like > OCaml. > > If you had actually taken time to read me rather than make pointless > inflammatory comments, you would have realized that I never implied this at > any point in the discussion. > > So to help your inability to read here's a summary of what I said: > > 1. Having the LGPL and the proposed unfair CLA is inacceptable. It is > harmful to the growth of the project and hence given the status of the > project in the OCaml community to the latter itself. > > 2. If OCamlPro wants to have more leeway to do whatever it wishes with > opam and its contributions they should rather license it under a more > liberal license and avoid the CLA. > > 3. I'm perfectly fine if opam stays with the LGPL. I'm not however fine > with the added CLA. > > So now do actually try to act like a grown up person and comment on the > actual problem which is the unfair CLA, not the LGPL vs BSD problem. > > Best, > > Daniel > > > _______________________________________________ > opam-devel mailing list > opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org > http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel > -- Jeremie
_______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
