On 24 Feb 2016, at 16:06, Grégoire Henry <gregoire.he...@ocamlpro.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, it seems to be back up again, so I'm restarting the CI jobs. >> Is the configuration of the server available so I can set it up as a >> local Docker container alongside the CI runs? We can spin up around >> 3000 containers simultaneously in a bulk run, so this can hit the >> cloud service pretty hard if they all make HTTP requests for a >> solution at the same time (and pollutes your logs with CI noise). > > Indeed, there is actually a global rate limiter that your bulk runs > may trigger. We did not took the time to release the tool, yet. We > will discuss this. I will let you now. >
No problem at all -- I'll wire up a quick aspcud<->socat container to work around the issue for now (the bulk builds would also benefit from having a deterministic solver binary tied to the run, so we can chase down aspcud/gringo/clasp compatibility issues as well). Thanks for the very speedy response! -anil _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
